Having taught Huck Finn with utmost sensitivity to high school students, I felt intrigued by Percival Everett's idea of James, an imagined retelling of runaway life from Jim's perspective. In Twain's work, I certainly found Jim to be a most sympathetic character - he helps Huck after the escape from his abusive father, prevents Huck from experiencing potential trauma, mourns for his own family, and never addresses the boys' misbehavior. The non-condemning character of Jim persists to survive and escape condemnable injustice. Though Huck has his "I'll go to hell" epiphany, Jim remains static. He has his freedom, but he surely has much more depth than shown. Everett's James put me at a crossroads - would I love this new fictional life or fully favor the original? I applaud this deep study of a most plausible, conflicted, and rightly critical James. And in the end, readers are given more reason to engage in profundities of natural and perceived identity.
Congratulations to Percival Everett for winning the 2024 National Book Award!